"What is the first rule of a firearm encounter?", if you have attended I.S.C.A.P.E. training then you know. When I pose this question at each class, there is several response's like: "have a firearm", "draw quick", "win". Though they are all good answer's when in the heat of the encounter, they do not address the "first rule of an encounter", which is DO NOT BE THERE!! When I bring this up there is a few chuckle's and people look at me like "no kidding", but if you think about it, this is the rule that will keep 98% of people from every being in the situation to have to even start the process of defending themselves. The other 2% are the situation that materialize with the person doing everything correct, but a determined terrorist/criminal makes the decision for them.
This is why I place "situation awareness" as number one on the list of priorities that a person has to develop, which I address in another article. We must have a questioning attitude as we move through the dynamic world of society. People, believe thanks to television and motion pictures that the thug/criminal scumbag will be dressed in dirty clothes and will stick out like a sore thumb in a crowd. But, what about when you are in a hall way or store and you hear screams or shots? You have to process this information and act, now!
We must understand that taking action, does not necessarily mean that we "access" our firearm, sweeping our garment out of the way and getting that good purchase on the pistol. We default ALWAYS to the "first rule of an encounter, do not be there". We take action by utilizing cover and concealment (knowing what it is) and get to an exit. We take action by implementing the plan we made for the area/building we are in, you did have a plan right?
Will the plan be affected by who we are with? Sure it will, it is easy to act alone, but through in the dynamic of your child or spouse and it change's a little. But, with a little training/education and a visual mindset, it can become natural. Let me see if I can give some insight on this with some relation to some lesson's from the military.
Infantry and special operation's do something called "going on patrol", which is "military tactic, which is a sub-unit or small tactical formation, sent out for the purpose of combat, reconnaissance or both". This small unit consist anywhere from 2-12 men. Each person in this patrol, has a specific job there perform, keeping in mind that all are cross trained on the others. The patrol moves through hostile terrain, to reach their objective, at which time there will perform their task, then the real key is returning back to base (home), safely. Starting to see a slight similarity? After all when we leave home to go to the store, in essence are we not doing same thing on a less dangerous level?
Now, long before the patrol even leaves the safety of the perimeter of the base, they have done certain things, because they know that "the devil is in the details". The figure out the safest route to the target and back. They communicate the duties of each member of the patrol, they ensure that each member has the equipment they need and in proper place (inspect), they then work out "the what if's", what are we going to do if this happens and than happens? Then they do what is called Immediate Action Drills (I.A.Drills), which is the patrol rehearse's the reaction to a certain situation, till it is done right and all problems worked out. They plan what to do if fired upon, if someone is injured, if they have to break contact (get away quickly), where and when to meet up if they get split up, and how they are getting back. This way everyone is on the same page, and no matter what happens, they can get "home" safely. There of course if more to this and it goes in more detail, but we can see where some of these thing's can translate to armed citizens using some of the tactics to there advantage. Let's look at a few of them.
Safest route- as we move through our usual routine in life, we pretty much know how to get to the store's, school's, work and various other venture's, like it is second nature. Now, think how you felt when you left your home to go to one of these place's and the road was block for some reason, you was actually stunned, upset and had to figure out another way around. I suggest take a few minutes on paper, smart phone or whatever and sit down and actually draw it out, then plan an alternate route. Along with that in today's world, where would be a good place to pull off and take a phone call or fix emergency issue's. What this will do for you is let you see your world in a new light, and get you start to do some planning. Which will begin the thinking process of being aware. This is extremly critical to do if you are planning to be in an area/city that you are not familiar with! When I am going to a city I am not familiar with, I literally sit down and draw out route from hotel to the places I am going to and have a minimum of one alternate route. In today's world it is quicker, because we have smart phones/computers and all the information we need, and with a "click" we can print it out. If you was going to a foreign town would it not make you more comfortable knowing the rounte, and let you focus on other threat's?
As you can see, this will obvious apply to safe route into and out of any building's as well. We can use the modern tool's actually see where stores are located, where to park and how to approach them. But, what about once we are in the facilities? You must learn to look for exit's when ever you walk into any shop or store! You do not have to, step in the store and goose neck around. As you come into the shop and browse, just casually look around for the exit's, other patrons and employee's. This takes but a few second's, after you get use to doing it.
I.A. drills- Though none of use have the time to spend an hour or two to practice immediate action drill's before we go out the door, can not deny the importance of it. Actually, there are some common problem's all patrol's face that they have S.O.P. (standard operating procedure) drill's for them, and only rehearse them once or twice to ensure that everyone is up to standard before they go out. This allows the patrol members to concentrate on more specific drill's for the patrol. One of those is what to do if "Ambushed", fired upon. Which would be good for us to have the same plan. Patrol, S.O.P., I.A. drills for this action if broken into "Near ambush" and "Far ambush".
Near ambush is taking fire within 150 yards (keep in mind in the military they use rifle's). If the patrol is in a close ambush, they will turn into the fire and begin returing more accurate fire (reason being, is that in an ambush this close, the best thing to do is make the other guy in fear of his life). Now, how would this translate to the armed citizen? First we use pistol's so range will be closer. Second, you will only do this as a patrol would when your life is in immediate danger of death and/or bodily harm (crippling injury). So, we could reasonably set our distance at 7 yards, due to the time lost in reaction, as is demonstrated by the "tueller drill". So, now we have as an example, set our "line of action" at 7 yards, which in turn will make our decision easier to at a minimum get to our pistol and/or get it out. Then we have to take in the circumstances to decide if a trigger press is needed. Keeping in mind, that in an armed citizen's world that the threat could of ceased do to the action you just did, so the thought process is ongoing.
Far ambush is taking fire from 150 yards and beyond. If the patrol is in a far ambush they will almost always "break contact", (disengage from the fight). They will do this by a tactic known as a "peel". One member will give cover, as the other moves to rear, then they will cover him as he moves (leap frog effect). What lesson can be learned for the armed citizen. Even with all the high tech. firearms, gadgets and highly trained warriors, will always get to safety if they can! This is where anything that is 8 yards or beyond, needs to beconsidered time to "break contact", we move toward cover & concealment, creating time and distance to our favor. Perhaps we take the time to work with our family unit, so we can move as one. You do not need to be a S.W.A.T. team, but some small prior planning/rehearsal (sound familiar)and discussing, if this happens, I want you to do this. If nothing else, the spouse, grab your belt and guide you to the exit, so you can concentrate on the threat, would be helpfull, right?
Injured person, this is something that very few armed citizen take into consideration, unless they have served in the military and been down range. The armed citizen need's to understand that the likely hood of having people injured in a situation is high. Also, that the chance's of them being injured is also extremely high. In my advanced class I bring this up, and you can see the look of shock on the experianced people face that they haven't thought of that, as I explain my technique for assesting. So, we can again take a lesson from the patroling tactics and start to create our own plan for dealing with injuries. The one thing I can not express enough is training/education in intermediate or critical first aid (not the basic boy scout or red cross class). Possesing the information is more valuable then having the winning lottery ticket, don't believe me? If you or your child was sitting against a wall with a hole in the side of the chest, would you pay millions to stop it or know how to? Of course, you would as would any reasonable person. So, why not plan ahead and take a course on using procedure to take care of injured people? The reason, it is most valuable, is you have the knowledge and can apply it, even when you don't have high speed medical gear, you can use field expediante stuff. Also, you will learn what you can do with one hand, which is valuable if you are the one injured and the one with the knowledge. Then you can form a more detailed plan, based on limitation if this happens or that happens, and have training reflect it?
The one thing that always makes a patrol successful or faulter is what they pay attention to. Doing patrol's are very taxing on a person, because you are constantly on alet for issues or intelligents. In the armed citizens world, you are constantly being situational aware, which is our determination of the facts. Take the time to sit down and draw our your route, draw out a situation in a store, then think through it. What would be the line? What is the right way to do it, realisticly. Visualising, and planning what to do will give any law abiding citizen a second in favor of life and happiness. I will give up 15 minutes to and hour, of planning to keep that last second of my life from being closer than needs to be.
Friday, September 18, 2015
Friday, September 11, 2015
9/11 and the 2nd Amendment
First, please take a moment and remembe the brave men and women, we lost 14 years ago to the terrible terrorist attacks. Then Raise your head high and let your heart swell with pride at being an AMERICAN! A country where liberty and freedom will never become oppressed. Let us use this time to reflect at what and why 9/11 happen and how this country having the 2nd Amendment keeps us safer. I do not intend for this to be any kind of rant or political thesis, though there will be times I may address it.
The atrocious attack's that happen on September 11th, where terrorist siezed planes and in essence turned them into bombs/missles, happen how? Their was not one firearm involved with the attack, now remember this was the most lost of American life on our soil, only beaten out by the battle of Antietam (Civil War battle which was fought only by American's). The terrorist, scum, seized control of the plane with box cutters!! Yet to this date, there is no law, nor legislation that has been made to keep these horrific weapons from terrorist hands? Think of how that translates to all the law's and legislation that is pushed to do away with the 2nd Amendment?
Why did the terrorist use box cutter's and not firearms? Well first off, if they really wanted to they could of smuggled firearms onto the plane. It had nothing to do with the weapon used to take control, but more to do with accessibility and intent. You see, they would of had a "harder" time getting firearms with out raising suspicion with their visa's (and how did a few get in the country when they was on the "Terrorist Watch List"). They did not want to use firearms on the plane! First, a funny thing happens to an airplane at altitude, when a bullet punches a hole into the fuseflage of the plane, it has a tendancy to "suck" items out and cause grave damage. Remember, they wanted to the plane to use as a "missle" to strike an intended target. Which bring's up a point that seldom get's discussed a lot. During my time in the military I had the pleasure of meeting with and training with several "Air Marshal's". These men and women are top notch and true professionals. I can tell you, from training with them, if there would of been one on the plane it NEVER would of made it to the target. They are shooter's on pare with any special forces out there or competitor. So, what wasn't there one on any of the planes? It was long standing policy that they only flew on international flight's, up untill the 90's (after Desert Storm) and the terrorist threat's against the United States became more severe, then they was "charged" with being on "high profile threat domestic" flights. What else is seldom discussed is that when the two term Administration before 9/11 took office, they "CUT" deep the intelligents and "Air Marshal" service's to balance the budget. There was not that many, the one's we had was over tact's and was not at the standard they once was. Sorrowly it took the 9/11 attack to bring this into light and now they are back and better than before.
Secondly, there is the simple fact that one of the hostages, can and would of, taken the firearm from the terrorist and then eliminated the scum from the earth. We, American's have firearms,bred into our very fabric from the foundation of this country. Someone on those planes would know how to use the firearm effectively. This is well known through out the world! Because we have the 2nd Amendment right in the Constitution, this is the reason we have never been invaded since the war of 1812 (british burned Washington D.C.). The Japanese believed that American's have a firearm in every home and they know how to use it, "a rifle behind every blade of grass". The russian's believed up to the 90's that we mandated that our youth take part in organization's to learn not only how to shoot, but how to live off the land and fight (Boys and Girl Scouts of America).
Having the 2nd Amendment, is what keeps this Country from being invaded and lends itself to assist in the temptation of Terrorist organization from becoming more aggessive here. Though, you are starting to see more "domestic terrorist" incident's taking place (it is this author's opinion, that these are only called "domestic" in a political sense and being quelled for those reasons). These attack's are not accidents, they are purposely driven. They are "feeling out our defenses", same way a patrol does in time of battle. Take the time to become trained and educated on the use of firearms, this is our patriotic duty to this great country, besides what other right gives you the power, to stand up and say no, I will not be a victim. We will not tolerate people who want to oppress us.
The atrocious attack's that happen on September 11th, where terrorist siezed planes and in essence turned them into bombs/missles, happen how? Their was not one firearm involved with the attack, now remember this was the most lost of American life on our soil, only beaten out by the battle of Antietam (Civil War battle which was fought only by American's). The terrorist, scum, seized control of the plane with box cutters!! Yet to this date, there is no law, nor legislation that has been made to keep these horrific weapons from terrorist hands? Think of how that translates to all the law's and legislation that is pushed to do away with the 2nd Amendment?
Why did the terrorist use box cutter's and not firearms? Well first off, if they really wanted to they could of smuggled firearms onto the plane. It had nothing to do with the weapon used to take control, but more to do with accessibility and intent. You see, they would of had a "harder" time getting firearms with out raising suspicion with their visa's (and how did a few get in the country when they was on the "Terrorist Watch List"). They did not want to use firearms on the plane! First, a funny thing happens to an airplane at altitude, when a bullet punches a hole into the fuseflage of the plane, it has a tendancy to "suck" items out and cause grave damage. Remember, they wanted to the plane to use as a "missle" to strike an intended target. Which bring's up a point that seldom get's discussed a lot. During my time in the military I had the pleasure of meeting with and training with several "Air Marshal's". These men and women are top notch and true professionals. I can tell you, from training with them, if there would of been one on the plane it NEVER would of made it to the target. They are shooter's on pare with any special forces out there or competitor. So, what wasn't there one on any of the planes? It was long standing policy that they only flew on international flight's, up untill the 90's (after Desert Storm) and the terrorist threat's against the United States became more severe, then they was "charged" with being on "high profile threat domestic" flights. What else is seldom discussed is that when the two term Administration before 9/11 took office, they "CUT" deep the intelligents and "Air Marshal" service's to balance the budget. There was not that many, the one's we had was over tact's and was not at the standard they once was. Sorrowly it took the 9/11 attack to bring this into light and now they are back and better than before.
Secondly, there is the simple fact that one of the hostages, can and would of, taken the firearm from the terrorist and then eliminated the scum from the earth. We, American's have firearms,bred into our very fabric from the foundation of this country. Someone on those planes would know how to use the firearm effectively. This is well known through out the world! Because we have the 2nd Amendment right in the Constitution, this is the reason we have never been invaded since the war of 1812 (british burned Washington D.C.). The Japanese believed that American's have a firearm in every home and they know how to use it, "a rifle behind every blade of grass". The russian's believed up to the 90's that we mandated that our youth take part in organization's to learn not only how to shoot, but how to live off the land and fight (Boys and Girl Scouts of America).
Having the 2nd Amendment, is what keeps this Country from being invaded and lends itself to assist in the temptation of Terrorist organization from becoming more aggessive here. Though, you are starting to see more "domestic terrorist" incident's taking place (it is this author's opinion, that these are only called "domestic" in a political sense and being quelled for those reasons). These attack's are not accidents, they are purposely driven. They are "feeling out our defenses", same way a patrol does in time of battle. Take the time to become trained and educated on the use of firearms, this is our patriotic duty to this great country, besides what other right gives you the power, to stand up and say no, I will not be a victim. We will not tolerate people who want to oppress us.
Thursday, September 10, 2015
Your position is key
The word "position" is used in the firearm community to describe the stance one takes when engaging in shooting activity. For the sake of this blog piece I will just talk about defensive handgun use. There are muliple shooting positions and ways to do them, but if you break them down it come down to three. The Isosceles, Weaver and the Chapman stances. One thing to keep in mind up front. Though there are fundamentals that need adheard to to be a more constistant shooter, we are all built differently and must adjust the position for ourselves. What may work for one person, may not work for another, could be do to body style, an old injury, or just not as comfortable. As with all things, there are pro's and con's to each. I will address them briefly and offer some tips that may help some who are struggling. One thing I will say now, seek some training from a qualified, "competent" instructor to help not just teach you, but break it down so you understand.
The Weaver and the Chapman are both named after the person who came up with and used the position. The Isosceles, is so named because of the shape the arms make which resemble the triangle. No matter the stance you take, we must remember that it all start's at ground level. I see a great many students seem to forget that the feet should be comfortable distance apart and that the weight should rest mainly on the ball of your feet. This will place you into the firearm and assist with recoil. You also should work on your natural point of aim. Basicly, you want to be lined up with your target, naturally. How do we do this? You can do this at home, with a safe backstop and an empty pistol. Take up your position, and aim the safe, empty pistol at a target. Now close your eyes, then open them. Did the pistol move? Resist temptation to move the pistol back on target with muscles, instead simple adjust your feet, in or out untill it comes back in line. Then close your eyes and open to check and see if lined up. Once you have your feet adjusted, to where you close your eyes and open them and remain on target you are good to go. If you will do this a few times a week, you will train your body/brain that when you pick up the pistol, and take a stance it will be natural. This in turn will help you be more accurate and more consistant. Okay, now we have our feet in correct place, now we want to bend are knee's naturally, this helps with recoil as well as blood flow. Now let's take a look at the stance's for our upper body.
The Weaver, was created by Jack Weaver a law enforcement officer back in the 60's. Up to this time, everyone was pretty much using the old standard of shooting one handed. Col. Jeff Cooper held a shoot at Big Bear, California every year. Mr. Weaver came and beat everyone with his new position. Col. Cooper then adopted and became the biggest promoter and Instructor for it and is the very foundation of GUNSITE school. Let's look at the stance. We get a good two handed grip (I wrote about in another Blog), extend your arms out. Now we take and bend our support elbow straight down, like we are resting it on our ribcage, at the same time we pull the pistol inward. Our strong arm is pressing outward, with a slight flex in the elbow. This gives us isometric support in controling recoil. To make this position work best, one foot needs to be placed forward (usually the support side) into more of a boxer stance. This will also "blade" our body more to the side of our target. This stance is often favored by people with strong chest and shoulders. The Pro's are it "blade's" us from target, is usually quicker and handle recoil better. The Con of this is it takes a lot of practice and there is a slight loss of mobility from the boxer type stance. but try it, I have taught many people it and they favor it, but be warned the isometrics will make your tired quicker.
The Chapman, was created by pistol champion Ray Chapman. Mr. Chapman won several regional, state and national titles using his method. In essence, Mr. Chapman used the weaver type stance, with one modification, he thrust his shooting arm straight out, making it more rigid. He also would lay his head more over onto his shoulder, in essence making his arm and shoulder a "rifle stock". This method works a little better for people with some shoulder injury than the weaver. The Pro's are that is it very consistent, strong position. The con's as with the weaver is lack of mobility, and does take a little while to become comfortable with it. If you are cross eyes dominate it take's a lot of practice with both to become comfortable with it.
The Isosceles, is named after the triangle our arms form. This is a more natural and basic way of shooting the pistol with both hands and why it is taught first to many new shooters. This position became popular in the 80's by competive shooters and was quickly adopted by the military. For this position we get a good two hand grip, then we press both arms out in front. One big mistake people make is they lock the elbows in this position, this will cause tendonitis in your elbow's (caller shooters elbow, like tennis elbow). We want are elbow's slightly bent to prevent this and assist with recoil. There is a more modern technique called the Modified Isosceles, this has the elbow's break outward slightly, which in turn makes are elbows shock absorbers. The other big differance with this stance is that is squares us up with our target. So natural point of is more natural. The Pro's is that this is the easiest and quickest to learn, and provides more mobility. The con is that it is usually harder for people to learn to master recoil control.
In all position's the head should still be head erect, to ensure that the eye is naturally centered, to focus on the front sight more clearly. The back should be straight, but the whole body should be leaned forward. The rule of thumb is that the chest should be past the belly button. Though this may feel slightly unnatural at first, you will find a big differance in managing recoil by doing this. In essence we are setting our body up to accept and handle the recoil of the pistol, rather than just holding it in front of us. This is what I call "getting into the pistol", you want to be aggressive, because let's face it, if you need to do it in a life/death encounter you will be more aggresive. You Do Not want to be standing straight up and down. The weight of your body will set on your heals and thus you are not balanced when the shot happens. Another thing you do not want to do is be "leaned backward", this is usually seen by someone who has not had any training and is scared of the pistol going off. If you see a person do this, be an ambassador and stop and nicely explain the problems and issues. Which are they will loose balance, do not have proper muzzle control, there grip will not be substantial to handle the pistol, and long period of doing this will cause back injury.
I hope this helps explain a few things and a few tips to help you out. Feel free to leave a comment.
Train as if your life is worth it!
In e
The Weaver and the Chapman are both named after the person who came up with and used the position. The Isosceles, is so named because of the shape the arms make which resemble the triangle. No matter the stance you take, we must remember that it all start's at ground level. I see a great many students seem to forget that the feet should be comfortable distance apart and that the weight should rest mainly on the ball of your feet. This will place you into the firearm and assist with recoil. You also should work on your natural point of aim. Basicly, you want to be lined up with your target, naturally. How do we do this? You can do this at home, with a safe backstop and an empty pistol. Take up your position, and aim the safe, empty pistol at a target. Now close your eyes, then open them. Did the pistol move? Resist temptation to move the pistol back on target with muscles, instead simple adjust your feet, in or out untill it comes back in line. Then close your eyes and open to check and see if lined up. Once you have your feet adjusted, to where you close your eyes and open them and remain on target you are good to go. If you will do this a few times a week, you will train your body/brain that when you pick up the pistol, and take a stance it will be natural. This in turn will help you be more accurate and more consistant. Okay, now we have our feet in correct place, now we want to bend are knee's naturally, this helps with recoil as well as blood flow. Now let's take a look at the stance's for our upper body.
The Weaver, was created by Jack Weaver a law enforcement officer back in the 60's. Up to this time, everyone was pretty much using the old standard of shooting one handed. Col. Jeff Cooper held a shoot at Big Bear, California every year. Mr. Weaver came and beat everyone with his new position. Col. Cooper then adopted and became the biggest promoter and Instructor for it and is the very foundation of GUNSITE school. Let's look at the stance. We get a good two handed grip (I wrote about in another Blog), extend your arms out. Now we take and bend our support elbow straight down, like we are resting it on our ribcage, at the same time we pull the pistol inward. Our strong arm is pressing outward, with a slight flex in the elbow. This gives us isometric support in controling recoil. To make this position work best, one foot needs to be placed forward (usually the support side) into more of a boxer stance. This will also "blade" our body more to the side of our target. This stance is often favored by people with strong chest and shoulders. The Pro's are it "blade's" us from target, is usually quicker and handle recoil better. The Con of this is it takes a lot of practice and there is a slight loss of mobility from the boxer type stance. but try it, I have taught many people it and they favor it, but be warned the isometrics will make your tired quicker.
The Chapman, was created by pistol champion Ray Chapman. Mr. Chapman won several regional, state and national titles using his method. In essence, Mr. Chapman used the weaver type stance, with one modification, he thrust his shooting arm straight out, making it more rigid. He also would lay his head more over onto his shoulder, in essence making his arm and shoulder a "rifle stock". This method works a little better for people with some shoulder injury than the weaver. The Pro's are that is it very consistent, strong position. The con's as with the weaver is lack of mobility, and does take a little while to become comfortable with it. If you are cross eyes dominate it take's a lot of practice with both to become comfortable with it.
The Isosceles, is named after the triangle our arms form. This is a more natural and basic way of shooting the pistol with both hands and why it is taught first to many new shooters. This position became popular in the 80's by competive shooters and was quickly adopted by the military. For this position we get a good two hand grip, then we press both arms out in front. One big mistake people make is they lock the elbows in this position, this will cause tendonitis in your elbow's (caller shooters elbow, like tennis elbow). We want are elbow's slightly bent to prevent this and assist with recoil. There is a more modern technique called the Modified Isosceles, this has the elbow's break outward slightly, which in turn makes are elbows shock absorbers. The other big differance with this stance is that is squares us up with our target. So natural point of is more natural. The Pro's is that this is the easiest and quickest to learn, and provides more mobility. The con is that it is usually harder for people to learn to master recoil control.
In all position's the head should still be head erect, to ensure that the eye is naturally centered, to focus on the front sight more clearly. The back should be straight, but the whole body should be leaned forward. The rule of thumb is that the chest should be past the belly button. Though this may feel slightly unnatural at first, you will find a big differance in managing recoil by doing this. In essence we are setting our body up to accept and handle the recoil of the pistol, rather than just holding it in front of us. This is what I call "getting into the pistol", you want to be aggressive, because let's face it, if you need to do it in a life/death encounter you will be more aggresive. You Do Not want to be standing straight up and down. The weight of your body will set on your heals and thus you are not balanced when the shot happens. Another thing you do not want to do is be "leaned backward", this is usually seen by someone who has not had any training and is scared of the pistol going off. If you see a person do this, be an ambassador and stop and nicely explain the problems and issues. Which are they will loose balance, do not have proper muzzle control, there grip will not be substantial to handle the pistol, and long period of doing this will cause back injury.
I hope this helps explain a few things and a few tips to help you out. Feel free to leave a comment.
Train as if your life is worth it!
In e
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)